Talk:Should've Been Me

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Should've Been Me article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Requested move 21 March 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 09:04, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should've Been Me (Naughty Boy song) → Should've Been Me – Only song title with an article Hadji87 (talk) 23:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)--Relisting. -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 13:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support - it's the only topic with an article with this name. Should've Been Me already redirects here. --В²C ☎ 02:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, yes the only one currently with this exact title, BUT the classic and much covered 1954 Ray Charles song also sometimes gets the "It" dropped. This UK No.97 download has only recently been directed here. The baseline really should have been pointing at It Should've Been Me. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you cite any reliable sources, much less a number significant enough to warrant consideration here, that refer to the Ray Charles song as "Should've Been Me"? --В²C ☎ 15:48, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support. A hatnote is good enough for any confusion between this and topics called "It Should've Been Me". Nohomersryan (talk) 19:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the above. Dohn joe (talk) 14:19, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Modified hatnote for better navigation. Also, no other song of the exact name may challenge this one for now. --George Ho (talk) 05:12, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.