Talk:Showgirl: Homecoming Live/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Grnrchst (talk · contribs) 08:41, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Lead

 * "singer and songwriter" Could be contracted to singer-songwriter


 * Was it also released internationally by Parlophone? Or did Parlophone only release it in the UK?
 * ✅ added EMI which released it internationally

Background

 * Frontier Touring Company is cited a couple times in this section. As this company is non-independent source, it would be ideal if you could find alternative sources for the information it's cited to.
 * ✅ replaced


 * Remove the Amazon sales page for the album. The information it's cited to is already sourced from a more clearly reliable source, so there's no need.
 * ✅ removed

Reception

 * MSN Music should be in italics.

Commercial performance

 * No notes

Track listing

 * No notes

Personnel

 * Maybe provide a link to liner notes for clarity.

Charts

 * Think this section and the "Commercial performance" section could be merged, as they're depicting more or less the same thing in different forms.
 * Mmm I think it's better the way it is now, is that OK? Alex reach me! 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Aye looks good! --Grnrchst (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Certifications

 * No notes

Release history

 * Table formatting has an error, so there's no bottom line for the "Format", "Label" and "Ref" columns. This needs fixing.
 * What do you mean? Alex reach me! 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * It was a problem with the row span being set too long. I've fixed it now, see the diff. --Grnrchst (talk) 07:49, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Checklist
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * All very well written, with no clear spelling or grammatical mistakes.
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * References should be gone over in order to make sure they're fully cited, not missing dates of publication, authors, etc.
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * There's a couple instances of non-independent sources, from the touring company and a sales page for the album, in the Background section.
 * c. (OR):
 * Spotchecked most of the direct quotes and they're all verified.
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * Earwig only flags the direct and attributed quotes.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * Perhaps it could do with a bit more about the concert itself.
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Last revert was in 2007.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Album cover is fair use, photo of the concert is licensed under CC 4.0.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Alt text aught to be provided for the images.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Holding for now, as a couple of the sources in the Background section are bugging me. Aside from that, this is a very well put-together article that I think could quite easily be passed.
 * I have addressed most of the issues, see above. Alex reach me! 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Looks all good now, excellent work! :) --Grnrchst (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * Last revert was in 2007.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * Album cover is fair use, photo of the concert is licensed under CC 4.0.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Alt text aught to be provided for the images.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Holding for now, as a couple of the sources in the Background section are bugging me. Aside from that, this is a very well put-together article that I think could quite easily be passed.
 * I have addressed most of the issues, see above. Alex reach me! 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Looks all good now, excellent work! :) --Grnrchst (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Holding for now, as a couple of the sources in the Background section are bugging me. Aside from that, this is a very well put-together article that I think could quite easily be passed.
 * I have addressed most of the issues, see above. Alex reach me! 00:15, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Looks all good now, excellent work! :) --Grnrchst (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much! Looks all good now, excellent work! :) --Grnrchst (talk) 07:52, 4 July 2023 (UTC)