Talk:Signatures with efficient protocols

I missed the discussion about the deletion at the time. I certainly agree that the text can be improved but believe that it is an important concept for electronic privacy. Whether to call it CL-signature or Signature with efficient protocols is debatable. While the former is possibly more specific and more common, the latter is the name that Camenisch and Lysyanskaya chose themselves.

--Markulf (talk) 12:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)