Talk:Silent Witness

BBC Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Bbcsw.jpg[edit]

Image:Bbcsw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 09:39, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Harry nikki leo 2.jpg[edit]

Image:Harry nikki leo 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:40, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Leo sam harry.jpg[edit]

Image:Leo sam harry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Harry nikki leo 2.jpg[edit]

Image:Harry nikki leo 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:43, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Leo sam harry.jpg[edit]

Image:Leo sam harry.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 12:54, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Harry nikki leo 2.jpg[edit]

Image:Harry nikki leo 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:10, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not up to date[edit]

There is a reference in the introduction to series 12, implying (I think) that it it is the latest series. There as definitely been a series 13 and perhaps a 14. I am no expert so it's not appropriate for me to write it up...can someone either update this or move the ref to series 12.

222.84.89.254 (talk) 17:47, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Paul Trundley[reply]

No copyright problem[edit]

There was a recent spot of the Overview section also appearing on TV.com, but investigation revealed that actually the article had been borrowed from here to there. See Wikipedia:Copyright problems/2011 January 11 for details. Splash - tk 14:18, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Updating" on the demise of Harry[edit]

For people "updating" on the death of the character of Harry Cunningham, it really needs a reliable source. In this interview Tom Ward says "And there's a moment when it looks like Harry's dead!" So. In the absence of reliable sources that say Ward has left the show, probably more sensible to leave it as it is. --Beloved Freak 23:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Harry features in official BBC episode guide for next week. [1] Maybe not dead? --Beloved Freak 23:19, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't meant to cause trouble or anything! I looked at the BBC site and saw the 'With Harry dead' statement and made an assumption. Seeing as it lists him in the cast for the finale, I'll revert my changes. Iamthedoctor2009 (talk) 23:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. I don't really care that much. Just saw someone crying on Twitter because "Wikipedia says Harry's dead so it must be true!" :) --Beloved Freak 23:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh right, what have I done?! Haha! Iamthedoctor2009 (talk) 23:36, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jack[edit]

In the main character section, Thomas is “described as charming, charismatic and socially shrewd”. No source, please note, but no-one could argue against that. In comparison, there is no description of Jack’s character. IMO that’s because he’s character-less, totally devoid of any charisma whatsoever. (In fact how he ever made it into the programme is beyond me, but that’s by the by; watching his almost leading role in the story set in Mexico was painful.) So I edited in that he has no charisma, but this was reverted. Comments, anyone? Does anyone disagree with my contention that he has no charisma? Boscaswell talk 22:08, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There having been no contrary comments, no disagreements, I’ll make the change. Boscaswell talk 20:53, 25 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Theme Song[edit]

Would Silencium and its lyrics (with translation from Latin) warrant its own page?
Discussed here and here.--Lmstearn (talk) 09:03, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Broken links in table in section Episode[edit]

This page section #Episodes is a table of episodes. Very nice. Borrowed from page "List_of_Silent_Witness_episodes". Links within the table, within page "List_of_Silent_Witness_episodes" work. But those same links within the table in this page Fail. (While the link anchor is correct, it points to the wrong page. I do not currently understand how to fix that. EchoPapa 00:46, 2 September 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by EchoPapa (talk • contribs)

Viewing figures[edit]

Viewing figures are wrong as barb haven't released latest figures. Unreliable. Percy2345 (talk) 22:08, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Music[edit]

I HATE the beginning and ending theme music in Silent Witness! 74.194.121.107 (talk) 02:22, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]