Talk:Simla Agreement

Untitled
Uhhh, if I'm not wrong, isn't it "Shimla" instead of "Simla"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pulveriser (talk • contribs)
 * Shimla is the new name of the town. When the treaty was signed, the town was called Simla. Shimla is infact as recent as the 1980s, if I am not wrong -- Lost 15:14, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

Troops helds as prisoners of war?
This article says that 34,000 of those held by India as prisoners of war were military, while Indo-Pakistani War of 1971 says that 79,676 were uniformed (and over 50,000 were Army personel). Which number is right? Molinari 02:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

wikisource
The text of the agreement should be moved onto wikisource --PBS (talk) 17:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Merger proposal
There is another article (Simla agreement)about the same subject and having same title but different case. As Simla Agreement is a proper noun, this title follows the WP:TITLE guideline and therefore I propose merger of Simla agreement into this page. -- S M S  Talk 15:57, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

'Indo-Pakistani War' or 'Bangladesh Liberation War'
Most of the internal links listed under 'Indo-Pakistani War of 1971' are the war fraught between Mukti Bahini and West Pakistan army. Moreover these are happen before 3 December 1971, when India took part on war officially. I think it should changed to Bangladesh Liberation War.--Freemesm (talk) 18:31, 9 January 2013 (UTC)