Talk:Skendleby

Reassess - December 2013
Reassessed from B to C :- B articles would have all general information about place at least partially fleshed in per WP:UKVILLAGES, including enough stuff on History/Government/Geography/Demography/Economy/Culture/Landmarks/Transport/Education/Religion/Sport/Notables, to create reasonably-sized sections, and with infobox, as would eventually be expected for Good/Featured articles, all sourced and with appropriate style for refs. This one doesn't fit the bill. There may never be enough to fill in the necessaries, in which case the article is destined to stay as a lower class. Acabashi (talk) 22:32, 21 December 2013 (UTC)