Talk:Socialist Party of the Valencian Country

POV tag
The Dúnadan placed a POV tag to this article. I dont think it applies. The rather scant reasoning provided at the summary edit mentioned


 * "got dilluted", well, they did. There is no PSPV as such within the structures or ranks in the PSPV-PSOE.
 * something about "moniker". I have changed this (not very sure what that has to do with POV anyway)
 * "small nationalist". Well, they were small and they were nationalist. Again, I can't see the problem with it in POV terms, unless someone considers Reality itself being POV...

All in all, if there is any urge to tag this one, I guess the one which applies is "unreferenced".

In any case, besides impromptu tagging, help with referenced text contributions is welcome over here. Mountolive  group using a loop of another pop group 15:00, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Mountolive, it is simply the language used and the choice of words in value judgments. For example: "they merged to the more relevant" (how do you define relevancy? isn't perhaps "larger" a more neutral choice of words?); "they got diluted" (I don't think diluted, is the appropriate word given its negative connotation, perhaps a false friend? and it is also a value judgment. Perhaps "integrated into the larger PSOE"?
 * Perhaps we should call this article PSPV-PSOE, if only to make it more "relevant"?
 * And yes, I agree, we need several tags for the many unreferenced claims.
 * -- the D únadan 23:44, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok, but if it is a mere choice of language, are you sure that the best solution is tagging the article instead of improving whatever wording you find troublesome? I am pretty much ok with the suggested wording above, I just dont get your sudden coyness attack. Dont forget there is a course of action called editting prior to tagging...or maybe there is some guideline stating the contrary? I hope not... Mountolive   group using a loop of another pop group 23:53, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't mind changing the words, and de-tagging the article, and in light of our mutual consensus, I will. I just find your "sudden coyness attack" comment absolutely inappropriate, to say the least. -- the D únadan  23:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)


 * If you find it so offensive, I guess you should report it, then. Mountolive   group using a loop of another pop group 00:00, 21 August 2008 (UTC)