Talk:Socolar–Taylor tile

Removed some of the misleading claims in the article: the 3D tile is only ″weakly aperiodic″, which is not a very special condition. I am not sure what was meant by ″This tile is likewise the only known 3D aperiodic tile which can fill three-dimensional space unpredictably.″ It's not (strongly) aperiodic, and it is predictable (that is, understood) how it tiles.

Clarified that ″physical copies of the three-dimensional tile could not be fitted together without access to four-dimensional space.″ refers to the observation that the tiles would need to be reflected or come in two versions. Chaim Goodman-Strauss (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

But also, thanks for the article!!Chaim Goodman-Strauss (talk) 19:31, 15 June 2016 (UTC)