Talk:Son of a Plumber

Neutrality
I love this album, but the article is ridiculously fanboyish, with none of the formality and neutrality one would expect to find in an encyclopedia article. I agree with all of the superlatives thrown at the album, and Gessle's talent, but it has no place here.--190.37.176.12 23:26, 28 September 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree that there are superlatives, however it is in a musical analysis section which should highlight the good and bad points of an album. I think it should stay, or perhaps be modified to be a bit less biased!! Kojack0 08:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)


 * But the problem is that the analysis seems to have been done by the contributor himself. That is original research, which is not acceptable on Wikipedia. Citing reputable third-party reviews would be fine, but simply adding one's own opinions is not. I think this is the best album Per has ever done, but we can't just throw that in the article without a reputable source to back it up.--RicardoC 16:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)


 * Nearly 20 years later, but I hope I've finally fixed these issues. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk/contributions) 23:05, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Son of a Plumber. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616145813/http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/ar-20051.pdf to http://www.ifpi.se/wp/wp-content/uploads/ar-20051.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:13, 20 January 2018 (UTC)