Talk:South Asian Stone Age

Incomplete coverage
Sites such as Jwalapuram with human stone age activity even before 75000 years ago, are not mentioned at all.

Actually Jwalapuram is dated to right around that time, so it doesn't contradict anything. But linking it to the page would make sensespiderwing (talk) 14:20, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Untitled
This article proposes to discuss the Paleolithic and Mesolithic, but then discusses the Paleolithic and Neolithic. I agree that the article about the "stone age" should discuss the Neolithic, but what happened to the Mesolithic? Stepp-Wulf 02:49, 30 June 2007 (UTC).

This article is too short. India's most important neolithic site (Burzahom) does not appear. Mehrgarh in Pakistan is not much better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:6B:D10:7C01:BC42:1B91:9B92:E1DB (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 19:53, 9 November 2007 (UTC) Please do see if you can incorporate the latest findings from Attirampakkam in South india, attesting to the findings of Achuleian tools in a site there, dated to 1.2-1.5 million years ago. this fact might alter/modify some of the hypotheses here. http://www.antiquity.ac.uk/projgall/pappu297/

Parthasarathy Vallabhajosyula — Preceding unsigned comment added by 123.201.135.74 (talk) 06:44, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

"dated to 1.2-1.5 million years ago"

dated how??Wikibearwithme (talk) 05:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 06:34, 30 April 2016 (UTC)