Talk:Squared (web series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... we are not supposed to be One Direction anymore! --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 16:21, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • ...what? I'm sorry, that doesn't make much sense. "We are not supposed to be One Direction anymore" isn't a very valid reason why this article should be kept. --🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 16:26, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because... I meant that aims to be One Direction more --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 18:44, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Again, your contest makes absolutely no sense. What does One Direction have to do with this article or Wikipedia itself? --🎼Yexstorm2001🎼 (talk) 18:48, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@I Have Always Been a Twin: The article is nominated for deletion for not being notable enough for inclusion. For material published on the web to have its own article in Wikipedia, it should be notable and of historical significance. Wikipedia articles about web content should use citations from reliable sources that are independent of the subject. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:45, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Drm310: Please don't delete Phoebe's Fashion Blog! --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 15:29, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@I Have Always Been a Twin: That has nothing to do with this article at all. Even if it did, I am not an administrator and I cannot delete anything. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 15:34, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Drm310: Squared is part of WikiProject Australia and is untouchable. I am going to find it on Twin on Google Newsstand. We are called UrineForGas but not by a user in my house anymore, Andrews or belong to Andrew. I just found a new thing to do. I just found something to do. I just found a new something to do for Andrew! --I Have Always Been a Twin (talk) 16:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Being part of a project has nothing to do with whether an article can be found to be non-notable and nominated for deletion. Currently, the article has a single source that's over two years old; I have reservations about whether this YouTube channel is notable. —C.Fred (talk) 20:55, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have done a quick google on this and I not coming up with any other reliable 3rd party sources. Plus this is a YouTube channel not a TV series so the name of this article is misleading. If no other sources can be found should this article be nominated for deletion? At the very least it needs a name change to Squared (YouTube channel) WyrmVane (talk) 22:43, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 March 2018[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: this appears uncontroversial; in order to speed things up so that any AfD nomination can proceed, I am going to go ahead and move this to Squared2 (web series) per Category:YouTube series, with a redirect from the proposed title. Dekimasuよ! 17:44, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Squared (TV series)Squared2 (YouTube channel) – This is a page about a YouTube channel not a TV series WyrmVane (talk) 23:02, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support Current disambiguation is misleading and inappropriate. As an aside, I cannot see notability here. Shadow007 (talk) 01:15, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.