Talk:Stamina therapy

comment 1

The content of: Supposed effectiveness is false.

There are many doctor's certificates available providing evidence of the effectiveness of the treatments, these certificates are also available to the public

As stated in the same page, the method is controversial, this page is clearly written by an anti-stamina member and reports false information Since wikypedia is neutral the pro-stamina position should be reported. The pro-stamina position is as follows:

The pro-stamina association has provided doctors certificates providing evidence of teh effectiveness of the treatments. For example the Visual Evoked Potential of a young patient with a non reversible condition were "ABNORMAL" before the treatments and "NORMAL" after the treatment.

PLEASE DELETE OR EDIT the CURRENT WIKIPEDIA stamina page section: Supposed effectiveness

Supposed effectiveness[edit] Vannoni has never produced scientific evidence concerning the efficacy of the method but has always advocated its validity. These alleged benefits are highlighted by multiple videos, often self-produced, some of which were broadcast on television, most of time showing children.[13][14] From the investigations of the Prosecutor of Turin (who listens to several experts about), the benefits shown in the videos are not measured scientifically and objectively but the result of exaggeration or adjuvant therapies which these children are subjected, or normal physical growth that continues despite the disease Specifically the Visual Evoked Potential — Preceding unsigned comment added by M.stemcells (talk • contribs) 09:45, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

comment 2

For God's sake, the new edited part "Vannoni has produced scientific evidence concerning the efficacy of the method and has always advocated its validity. These alleged benefits are highlighted by multiple videos, often self-produced, some of which were broadcast on television, most of time showing children." is complete bullshit. Since when a video qualifies as scientific evidence? There is absolutely no scientific evidence concerning the efficacy of the method and Vannoni has never produced any, that's for damn sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.60.77.9 (talk) 21:05, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stamina therapy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20141006084209/http://www.bresciaoggi.it/stories/2325_home/892993_caso_stamina_andolina_sospeso_6_mesi_dallordine/ to http://www.bresciaoggi.it/stories/2325_home/892993_caso_stamina_andolina_sospeso_6_mesi_dallordine/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)