Talk:Stanley A. McChrystal

Criticisms anyone?
I would love to hear some criticisms from reliable sources. I'm sure there is. Whenever I have time I will try and try and do searches for like "criticisms against General McChrystal".Untermenschen (talk) 04:56, 8 October 2011

McChrystal Group Missing
Nothing on the McChrystal Group? Needs to be added. http://mcchrystalgroup.com/ 167.191.240.1 (talk) 18:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Stanley A. McChrystal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081208013220/http://www.jcs.mil:80/bios/bio_mcchrystal.html to http://www.jcs.mil/bios/bio_mcchrystal.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 09:29, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Resignation & Criticism
Its ridiculous that there are no quotes from the Rolling Stones article. Article reads like military propaganda. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.222.148.189 (talk) 11:50, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

... calls Trump dishonest and immoral
I'm reflecting where and how to mention it in the article. Does someone have ideas / proposals ? --Neun-x (talk) 09:14, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Was this article written by the general himself? A PR team?
what a disgrace and embarrassment this article is. It begins with a cherry picked hyperbole statement about him being the greatest warrior and leader, His controversies are skirted and distorted, and it reads like a public relations person submitted this or the general himself is editing this page. It fails on all levels of being objective, factual, and any semblance to encyclopedic integrity. Articles like these give Wiki its dubious reputation as not a source for information but nothing but edit wars, partisan bias, lies, and misinformation. Someone needs to rewrite the entire article. I would even consider deleting the article pending on a rewrite that is based on facts on objectivity rather than exaggeration, distortion, and bias. Shhsbavavaa (talk) 07:22, 11 October 2022 (UTC)