Talk:Station to Station

Releases, sides and labels etc.

 * US and U.K. release dates may be noted separately. Cute flags can even be used.
 * For the first remastering, Rykodisc (Dr. Mountain) did the remastering, and EMI released them in the U.K.
 * Would it be good it separate the original release into sides one and two? (by asking the question I obviously think so.)
 * Are catalog/catalogue numbers necessary?

On another point... "namechecking" sephirot is kind of... well, let's just say "namecheck" is not the right word. Can't think of it now, have to get ready for work.

Gloop. Fantailfan (talk) 11:58, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi mate, tks for the vote of confidence re. GA. Been spending so much time on military articles recently I'd put off a review for this but probably time now. In response to your points:
 * Based on general guidelines and album FAs I've checked I don't think the flags are a goer, but no prob re. the separate release dates.
 * Yep, Mountain and EMI can probably go in somewhere.
 * Articles on albums that started out as LPs seem to be moving to Side 1 and 2 divisions so no issue there.
 * I don't have a strong opinion on the catalogue numbers. A fellow editor went through and put them in all the Bowie album articles and I wasn't fussed either way. Since it's a bit of a 'standard' in the Bowie ones I think I'd leave for now and see what the consensus is from a review.
 * Agree "namechecks" isn't the best in this context, "alludes to" or "references" would be more appropriate but I used similar words nearby and couldn't think of anything else – suggestions welcome! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 13:12, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Re. #1, not aware of different UK/US release dates at this stage; done #3; modified "namechecks" as best I could. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:29, 15 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I have in my hand the EMI 1999 version and it has a hidden track 7, a version of Station to Station which I can't actually distinguish from the version at track 1, although it is 10:12 compared with track 1's 10:14. The disc also a CD-ROM interactive version. Zoe 06:07, 27 February 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoe Buchanan (talk • contribs)

White Light Tour?
I've never heard it called that. So far as I know it's always referred to as the Thin White Duke tour. Anybody else got a view? BTLizard (talk) 13:24, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
 * There is a citation for 'White Light Tour', so I think we can say that's at least a valid term. However, since it's not the only one, I've reworded the subsection heading to the more generic 'Concert tour'. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 14:58, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposal to move "Aftermath" section to the David Bowie article
I feel that the Aftermath section would fit better in the general David Bowie article, as it isn´t so much about Station to Station as about what happened on the subsequent tour. These rather controversial "incidents" are currently quite badly covered in the Bowie article (last paragraph of this section in the current version). Opinions? – IbLeo (talk) 21:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree the Bowie article treats it poorly, with vague and unsubstantiated statements - annoying as I'm quite sure I put in some more specific detail, mentioning the Victoria Station incident by name for example, in an earlier version and it's obviously been whittled away without my picking it up. Yes, we probably should take some of this and get it into the Bowie article but, as I said in the GA review (see 3. Broad in its coverage above), I'm reluctant to lose it here as I think it gives a fuller picture of the album's history, and it also balances the Background section. I'm pretty sure I've seen such Aftermath sections in other album articles, including FAs, though admittedly I couldn't name them off the top of my head as I don't spend that much time on music subjects these days... Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:07, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I admire your good work to rise this article to GA, and I understand your concern about moving the section. On the other hand, I don't believe that too much information should be repeated in different articles. So I compromised by adding a reference to the Aftermath section in the David Bowie article (this edit). – IbLeo (talk) 09:36, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 06:57, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Station to Station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111107224423/http://infodisc.fr/Album_B.php to http://infodisc.fr/Album_B.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:37, 26 December 2017 (UTC)

Krautrock influence?
Aside from the opening electronics of the title track, does anyone know of reported instances of a "krautrock" sound on the album? I know plenty of critics have written that there's a krautrock sound on the record but I'd love some more specific examples. The opening sound on "Station to Station" is clearly a Kraftwerk homage, and then I suppose the funk sound could be connected to CAN (Ege Bamyasi in particular) but even then, the funk sound in CAN is hardly their defining "krautrock" characteristic. Other than the fact that Bowie was reportedly listening to a lot of contemporary German artists around this time...where is the krautrock on Station to Station? Genuinely curious. Tactical Fiend (talk) 17:12, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I've found that the biggest influence of Krautrock on Station to Station is in the title track. When expanding its page, most critics have pointed out krautrock's influence in the song, most notably in the opening noise, but it's also prevalent later on when the tempo changes. Most biographers and Bowie himself have stated that the title track is the direct bridge between Young Americans and Low, which is Bowie's definitive Krautrock-influenced work. While the album itself is commonly regarded as the bridge, certain songs on the album like "Golden Years" and debatably "Stay" sound a lot more like YA than Low. But in terms of specifically krautrock, it's the title track that has the most influence of that genre. – zmbro (talk) 00:11, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I suppose I can hear that, with the experimental nature of the song. I've definitely had that thought about Young Americans and Station to Station. Station to Station is kind of the evil twin of Young Americans, to my ears. Tactical Fiend (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I can see that as well. Even though StS doesn't have the backing vocals of YA, tracks like "Golden Years" could easily be placed on YA with no issue. You have other funky tracks like "TVC 15" and "Stay" while others like "Word on a Wing" is a little soul-like and "Wild Is the Wind" is a ballad, which I don't recall Bowie making much of during this time in his career. Low is the massive outlier in Bowie's catalogue in terms of style. "Heroes" has the electronics of Low but in a more pop manner, so Low is his most electronic album (you can make the exception of "Be My Wife" which is more rock than electronic). I also find it interesting that Low has like 5 or 6 instrumentals, which was for sure something Bowie rarely did, but that can explain, or foreshadow, why he doesn't start his vocals in "Station to Station" until 3 minutes in. I would also call StS the "evil twin" of YA, especially since the Thin White Duke was his darkest character, and he moved to Berlin to escape that part of him. – zmbro (talk) 21:20, 15 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Perhaps you've already checked this out, but I recently finished the Low entry in the 33 1/3 series. Highly recommended, great history about not only Low, but some background on Station to Station and even The Idiot. I've read a few other entries in that series, some good some bad. This one does a good job of giving a lot of details on the writing and recording of Low without getting bogged down in the writer's opinions or "relationship with the music". Tactical Fiend (talk) 17:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC)

Extra track listings
Per WP:ALTTRACKLIST, should all these extra tracklists be included? Live Nassau Coliseum '76 seems unnecessary since that has its own page now, while things like the DVDs can be put into prose. What do you think? – zmbro (talk) 19:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi zmbro, are you talking about under Deluxe edition or under the overall 2010 reissues section? Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 02:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * , The overall 2010 reissues section. – zmbro (talk) 12:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Yeah, frankly I always felt that section overbalanced the article a bit, if you can reduce in line with MOS I'd say why not. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 21:35, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Artwork
Something I just thought of, should we add the 2010 artwork as an additional one? (this one). I ask because I typically see both the original and that one associated with the album almost interchangeably. – zmbro (talk) 18:57, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi Zmbro, yeah, although you can't see it in the article snapshot under Milestones anymore, I'm sure I would've included both when I put it up at GAN, and somewhere along the way it's been deleted. If I noticed it go, I can't recall what justification would've been used, and can't see a reason for not including it again. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 23:30, 31 August 2021 (UTC)