Talk:Steeple Aston

Steeple Aston was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 16, 2010	Good article nominee	Not listed
April 5, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Former good article nominee

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Steeple Aston/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Intelligentsium 00:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I'll be doing the review. This is my first review, so I'd appreciate any suggestions anyone else reading this might have. After a quick look at the article, it seems a bit short. You might want to expand it a bit; right now it's only about 2616 bytes of prose. More comments after I read it in more detail. Intelligentsium 00:25, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The sources seem to be rather raw - only a URL and a brief title. Could you use citation templates?
Page should be expanded to meet "Broad coverage" criterion
The lead section does not adequately summarize the article's contents
There is little information about the history of the manor after 1086
A lack of nominator response has led me to believe this article will not meet the Good Article Criteria in the near future

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Steeple Aston. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110609071933/http://www.bnc.ox.ac.uk/345/brasenose-college-archives-and-history-38/brasenose-people-216/principals-of-brasenose-470.html to http://www.bnc.ox.ac.uk/345/brasenose-college-archives-and-history-38/brasenose-people-216/principals-of-brasenose-470.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]