Talk:Street children in the Philippines

originality of the text, and NPOV issues
I have checked out some of the sources and so far they are looking like material is cut and pasted from them... and there are some NPOV issues, I will begin to rewrite for the NPOV, and help would be apprecited. Hohohahaha (talk) 17:42, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Problem with Ref. no. 7
It is given as refernce to many fact statements in the text, but the link doesn't lead anywhere. Other references will have to be added. Thanks Maysara (talk) 20:18, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Article needs rewrite
Statistics from the late 1990s and many undated statements. Several dead links. I've just deleted one section that was a copyvio (found using the Wayback machine on one of the dead links). I suspect that several others are too: the "problems" section reads like newspaper clippings and the "NGOs" section reads like brochure/advert clippings. This needs shredding and new, up-to-date research. --Stfg (talk) 19:39, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 one external links on Street children in the Philippines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080202085240/http://ipsnews.net:80/alert/countries/phils1.html to http://ipsnews.net/alert/countries/phils1.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090201201423/http://www.sunstar.com.ph:80/static/pam/2007/01/10/news/36.street.kids.rounded.up.html to http://www.sunstar.com.ph/static/pam/2007/01/10/news/36.street.kids.rounded.up.html
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20030504090802/http://www.ips.fi/koulut/199742/6.htm to http://www.ips.fi/koulut/199742/6.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 20:53, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅ — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 02:13, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

Section filled with seemingly non-notable organizations
The NGO responses section is currently a list of what appears to be mostly non-notable organizations. A number of them are cited with first-party sources. Wikipedia is not a business directory and we should only be mentioning notable organizations that are active in the region (We can't possibly list every business in the world). — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 01:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)