Talk:Sui Generis

Untitled
Cleaned up language significantly. The content however...--Fuhghettaboutit 10:53, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Moved from article

 * The facts (dates, order of events, etc.) stated in this article are questionable--Fuhghettaboutit 20:46, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

This was replaced with the cleanup-verify template. RJFJR 02:25, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Cleanup
(Please strike out when done)
 * 1) The headings should be more formal, in my opinion.

I think it's OK
As far as I know everything's OK... I did a minor change (it was not the censors who took those 2 songs from Instituciones but the record label itself who was afraid of the political violence of the time). The rest of the article is correct.

Fair use rationale for Image:Sui Generis.jpg
Image:Sui Generis.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Requested move
Sui Generis → Sui Generis (band) — per Naming_conventions_(precision), the article should be renamed to avoid confusion with Sui generis (small g). — supernorton 09:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Survey

 * Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with  or  , then sign your comment with  . Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.


 * Support per nom, but see Iron Maiden and Status Quo - precedent is against us. Tevildo (talk) 17:03, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The existence of such way of naming doesn't necessarily mean this way is correct or is obeying the guideline. --supernorton 05:48, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Oppose. This is a misreading of Naming_conventions_(precision). When there is a small difference due to capitalization, the solution is "provide links between the pages to reduce confusion for readers and editors." Specifically, hatnotes are recommended in a case like this, and both of these articles already have them (see red meat and Red Meat). Disambiguating the article name is nowhere recommended and is unnecessary. Station1 (talk) 02:15, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Discussion

 * Any additional comments:
 * comment: I think these cases should be first treated globally, and then, if the most common use is selected, decide which one is the right one. Mariano (t/c) 17:44, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
 * move to Sui Generis (band)as per supernorton Elan26 (talk) 18:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)Elan26