Talk:Supreme Court of Singapore

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I dont think it is appropriate that the generic term 'Supreme Court Building' relocate to here. It should go to a disambig. page listing the articles for the various court buil;dings around the world but in the mean time ive changed it to rediret to Category:National_supreme_courts... 121.45.139.177 (talk) 02:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you, but don't think it's a good idea for "Supreme Court Building" to redirect to a category. Why don't you go ahead and create a disambiguation page? — Cheers, JackLee talk 02:49, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was planning too time permitting - though though better to justify it first... 121.45.5.181 (talk) 15:10, 21 January 2008 (UTC) (author of comment 1)[reply]
Righto. If you're going to be hanging around, do think about creating an account! — Cheers, JackLee talk 15:21, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Sort of started, could you take a look and see if it conforms to all the Styles and is on the right track, to be honest im beginning to wonder if a category is a better way to go.... Steak Sandwich with the Lot (talk) 02:07, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for that. I've moved the disambiguation article to "Supreme court building (disambiguation)" so that it complies with rules on naming of articles (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style) and done some minor rephrasing and formatting, but otherwise it's fine. A disambiguation page is the right way to go, I think – articles are generally not redirected to categories. — Cheers, JackLee talk 12:39, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Supreme Court of Singapore. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:07, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Queen’s Counsel should be King’s Counsel[edit]

Just a note that I assume references to QC's should be updated to King's Counsel? 128.28.2.72 (talk) 10:53, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]