Talk:Susan Nigro

Copyright problem
This article has been reverted by a bot to as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:45, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Promotional?
It seems this article is more promotional than factual. It probably can be shortened to half the length and have the promotional stuff removed. Also the citations are either quite old or nonexistent. 108.81.226.148 (talk) 03:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:BOLD.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)