Talk:Suzy Shuster

"Controversies"
I've removed the ridiculous "controversies" section again. One, it's not even a little bit encyclopedic. Two, Shuster is not accused of doing anything remotely controversial. Let's use some common sense, please. | Mr. Darcy talk 03:31, 3 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Per WP:Undue: "An article should not give undue weight to any aspects of the subject, but should strive to treat each aspect with a weight appropriate to its significance to the subject. Note that undue weight can be given in several ways, including, but not limited to, depth of detail, quantity of text, prominence of placement, and juxtaposition of statements." Shuster's article is essentially a stub.  The "controversy" section is about half of the article, and her only involvement was a sarcastic email response.  Therefore, I agree with above, and will remove section because it gives undue weight to the significance to the subject.  Mitico (talk) 14:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


 * But that's what she's most notable for now. I say put it back in. Lothar76 (talk) 23:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)