Talk:TV Everywhere/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 21:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Me again. 23W 21:39, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Performed these copy edits; dupdet spotchecks return no bulk close paraphrasing.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Please remember to include relevant bibliographical information in your citations.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * I've added this logo; I think it oughta make things look spiffy.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Specific That's pretty much it, I think. Nice work (again). Hold for a fortnight. 23W 01:56, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Per WP:LEADLENGTH, the lead should be one or two paragraphs.
 * Some direct quotes require citations directly afterwards (WP:MINREF); I've tagged them using citation needed.
 * Addressed. ViperSnake151   Talk  02:25, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Noice. 23W 02:32, 22 August 2014 (UTC)