Talk:Tamara Ecclestone

WHY?
Why is there a page for this oxygen thief? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.112.2 (talk) 11:24, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Occupation ?
Occupation = heiress ? LOL what ???95.76.62.29 (talk)

Page removal?
Not sure what she has done to deserve a page, but I may be very out of touch with the tabloid generation. Marcus Tully 13:23, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, I agree, page removal. Its poor anyway Boils (talk) 07:45, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

This page reads more like a bad PR puff than an encyclopaedia. I wonder if she wrote it herself? Suggest deletion or significant edit. (Wonderwiki (talk) 21:37, 16 June 2009 (UTC))

Proposed deletion on 24 July 2009. Wikipeterproject (talk) 22:45, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

Slavica Radic nationality
Slavica Radic is Croatian, not Serbian. I am not a nationalist but this is as if you would claim that Van Morrison is English and not Irish. It can also be seen from the link (a newspaper article that the female part of the family is fan of Croatia and not Serbia. In the light of the recent events ( war in former Yugoslavia ) this is not really simple mistake. I despize nationalism but this is incorrect. Ariel Woland —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.2.10.141 (talk) 16:31, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Slavica Radic is Serbian from Rijeka/Croatia. My Serbian family is from Rijeka too, and there were a lot of Serbian people. After the war they were forced out, like Croatians who lived in Banja Luka (Bosnia). www.srpskadijaspora.info/vest.asp?id=6672  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.217.12.23 (talk) 16:15, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest
This article was recently nominated for deletion. I closed the discussion as "keep" but couldn't help but notice some troubling edit summaries in its history. To IP edtor 81.168.125.169. What is this "management company" you claim to be editing on behalf of?

Please review our guidelines on conflict of interest and neutral point of view. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

the updates to tamara ecclestones page were done by an individual that works for the company that manages her media and publicity both on and off line as requested. despite the protestations of certain individuals who mistakenly feel that it is their place to ammend, change and update pages of living individuals they know nothing about nor have any association with, nor have any mandate to do anything for or on behalf of !, the ammendments were in absolutely no way representative of a confilct of interest, and were actually factual updates about tamara and links to press and media articles. if wikipedia is not a portal wherby an individual can source accurate and up to date infomration on something or someone and on that page find up to date, correct factual and helpful links then what is it?, as it strikes me that the people who were unreasonably proposing the page for deletion were doing it out of nastiness, spite and making unecessary remarks. The page was not a coi or other wiki acronym and if the interest of wikipedia and those that feel it is their resonsibility to police it, is the quest is for factual information and links then surely LEAVE IT TO THOSE THAT HAVE THIS INFOMRATION !!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.168.125.169 (talk) 16:18, 20 November 2009 (UTC)


 * There are Wikipedia policy guidelines about what should and should not be included in an article. These guidelines, developed by consensus, are designed to maintain the credibility and relevance of the encyclopedia.  "Factual" updates must be encyclopedic (not trivia), relevant to the notability criteria of the article itself and, most importantly, be verifiable with an independent source.  What often happens is that an individual is notable for a particular reason, but the article about the individual becomes cluttered with information, which although interesting, isn't the reason that the person is worthy of an encyclopedic article in the first place.  This information is often trivia or, in worse cases, gossip, and should not be included in Wikipedia articles.  Wikipedia is not a magazine or a newspaper and people who are interested in celebrity gossip have lots of other sources to meet that need.  So editing here to uphold Wikipedia policy is not done out of nastiness but to ensure that what's written in the encyclopedia is consistent with its objectives.  That is in the best interests of both the subject (where the subject is a living person) and the reader.Wikipeterproject (talk) 17:31, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

ok i understand this and in fact none of what was on the page was gossip at all. it was an factual up to date article on the individual in question. forgive me if i dont know how to put it up properly or cite it or reference it or any of that. i agree to whoever said it was Pr'y. it was a bit. apologies. But if i were to put on some links to press articles on tamara in the refernces section would these be kept or would they be deleted by this wikipolice person? who gives them permission to do this? anyway all the links would be are links to magazine and media articles EXACTLY AS IS ON EVERYONE ELSE WIKIPEDIA PAGES ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.168.125.169 (talk) 12:45, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Removal of uncited material
I have removed a significant amount of uncited content in accordance with WP:BLP. It appears that the deleted information was written by a PR manager - either directly into the article or copied from PR material published elsewhere. In any case, uncited material is completely inappropriate for a biography of a living person. If some of the deleted material is suitable for inclusion, reliable, independent references must first be found. Wikipeterproject (talk) 09:55, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Nationality
The introductory paragraph is meant to contain the subject's nationality, not ethnicity. Unless she has Croatian citizenship, she is not "British-Croatian" or "English-Croatian". If she does, then please cite a source verifying this. The fact that her mother is Croatian is not significant enough to be mentioned in the lead (see WP:UNDUE). This information goes in the bit about her early life. ... disco spinster   talk  13:23, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

May and June 2014 edits
I made a number of changes to the article, all with fairly detailed edit descriptions. Most of these related to the removal of unsourced, or poorly sourced, material and the removal of trivia. These edits were reinstated without explanation by an IP user. I have reinstated the changes and welcome discussion of them here before they are reverted again. Wikipeterproject (talk) 13:51, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Wrong link
The hyperlink from Jay Rutland just links back to this article. Valetude (talk) 09:38, 18 March 2020 (UTC)