Talk:Tarantul-class corvette

Reference comments

 * Request that 194.85.148.66 be mindful in making "all Russkies are Commies" comments that such ill-informed negative assertions are unappreciated. In point of fact, during the Soviet era members of the Communist Party comprised less than 4% of the population and far from all of them were Russians.  In the current situation the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CFRF) is a relatively small organization with little to no functional influence on Russian policies of any kind.Moryak (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
 * He was trolling. 96.55.192.119 (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

US Navy
The operators list has the US Navy using this class of ship. Did the US receive a ship for evaluation or lease? Or is this false? I'm going to put a "citation needed" tag on it until someone can confirm or deny. I'm leaning towards just deleting the US from the list, though. I doubt the US has a Soviet/Russian ship in their position, though such occurrences are not unheard of. Ripberger (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Doh! Never mind.  I just re-read the article about the German corvette Hiddensee.  Even still, it's not technically a part of the US Navy.  It's a museum ship.  (And apparently, I need to get my eyes examined and actually read the whole article before going crazy with tags.  Mea maxima culpa!) Ripberger (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tarantul-class corvette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124115305/http://hnsa.org/ships/hiddensee.htm to http://www.hnsa.org/ships/hiddensee.htm
 * Added tag to http://balabin-1712.livejournal.com/3395.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118105013/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Veer.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Veer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Nirghat.jpg

questionable claim
"The need for these improvements was underscored by the First Gulf War, when 12 Iraqi Osa-I-class missile boats were destroyed or damaged by short ranged Sea Skua anti-ship missiles. They were attacked by British Lynx helicopters, but the Osa crews did not notice them because they flew below their radar horizon."

The Sea Skua uses a guidance principle that makes this impossible. The helicopter needed to have a radio sline of sight to the ship to engage it with the Sea Skua missile. I propose we delete that part, it has no source anyway. 193.25.47.211 (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sure. Sounds reasonable. Llammakey (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism
This page was vandalised today, we might want to consider protecting it. Aitorbk (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)