Talk:Tata Nano Singur controversy

Made the artile neutral and removed tags.
Someone should update the article if they find more links especially for Tata's role in all of this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.169.73.65 (talk) 15:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Illegal or not?
According to the Economist article, the Kolkata High Court permitted the use of the 1894 Land Acquisition Act: "Supreme Courts in several American states have ruled that governments cannot expropriate land for private development, but Kolkata’s High Court has judged differently. What counts as a public purpose, it has noted, is a “socio-economic question” that should be left to local governments to answer."

But the article states the opposite:''The law has provisions for state taking over privately held land for public purposes but not for developing private businesses. The illegality of the acquisition has been substantially conceded by the Kolkata High Court.''

The source/reference given in the article is a dead link.

Should the article be corrected? Wefa (talk) 14:31, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on Singur Tata Nano controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070123011919/http://cities.expressindia.com:80/fullstory.php?newsid=217799 to http://cities.expressindia.com/fullstory.php?newsid=217799
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070930060544/http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070122/asp/frontpage/story_7294279.asp to http://www.telegraphindia.com/1070122/asp/frontpage/story_7294279.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 05:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 5 one external links on Singur Tata Nano controversy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080726030921/http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070215/nation.htm to http://www.tribuneindia.com/2007/20070215/nation.htm#2
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929123413/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?date=2006-12-23&clid=1&id=168248 to http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?date=2006-12-23&clid=1&id=168248
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929102749/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=1&id=167862 to http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=1&id=167862
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070929115729/http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=23&id=171772 to http://www.thestatesman.net/page.arcview.php?clid=23&id=171772
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070715125228/http://in.news.yahoo.com:80/070610/211/6gult.html to http://in.news.yahoo.com/070610/211/6gult.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 23:02, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

Translate this into Bengali language
I want it to be translated into Bangla. Gentleman1223 (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

Requested move 14 March 2021

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: Moved, the move to 2008–2009 Singur farmers' protest was performed without consensus, hence the close is a "speedy revert" to Tata Nano Singur controversy. ─ The Aafī   (talk)|undefined  14:04, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

2008–2009 Singur farmers' protest → Tata Nano Singur controversy – Per WP:COMMONNAME Tayi Arajakate  Talk 03:17, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Adinew56 (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Don't change the headlines name, majority of the sources state that farmers protested vehemently regarding the Tata Nano project. Moreover, the supreme court of India stated land was given illegibly to the Tata Group. It is not a controversy. Keep the current name as it is.--Adinew56 (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * has been indefinitely blocked for disruption. The reasoning they provide here is original research and violates WP:COMMONNAME. They made the move recently without prior consensus and should be reverted to the former per WP:ONUS. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 08:46, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Crimes against humanity category removal
Crimes against humanity is a specific legal concept. In order to be included in the category, the event (s) must have been prosecuted as a crime against humanity, or at a bare minimum be described as such by most reliable sources. Most of the articles that were formerly in this category did not mention crimes against humanity at all, and the inclusion of the category was purely original research. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)