Talk:Taylor Swift/GA4

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 11:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Will have this to you soon. JAG UAR   11:02, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Initial comments

 * "The incident received much media attention and resulted in many Internet memes" - you should mention that Kayne's interference caused a lot of controversy too
 * "Swift remarked that in spite of keeping herself "as educated and informed as possible", she does not "talk about politics because it might influence other people"" - would flow better with an "and" in there: Swift remarked that in spite of keeping herself "as educated and informed as possible" and she does not "talk about politics because it might influence other people"
 * " She performed in a commercial for the Band Hero video game" - needs italics
 * " launched two Elizabeth Arden fragrances, Wonderstruck and Wonderstruck Enchanted" - semicolon needed instead of comma
 * Feel free to ignore this, but is there any need for the Concert tours section when they're already mentioned in the prose?
 * No dead links
 * No dab links

I've read through the article twice and have decided that I'm going to pass this outright, it's in brilliant shape. The lead summarises the article, the prose is very smooth and well written and the references are all OK. I've picked up a few minor issues but this article meets the GA criteria regardless. Well done! JAG UAR   10:02, 6 August 2016 (UTC)