Talk:Temple Emanuel (Kensington, Maryland)

Judaism Low‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maryland Low‑importance

	Maryland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maryland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maryland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MarylandWikipedia:WikiProject MarylandTemplate:WikiProject MarylandMaryland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Maryland may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Multiple issues[edit]

@Bohemian Baltimore, Materialscientist, and Quackslikeaduck: I've today made significant edits to this article that was, in the main, significantly unchanged since it was created by Quackslikeaduck in November 2016. Much of the article is written like an advertisement and self-promoting the congregation, in some cases, using self-published sources. It needs to be reviewed in the context of other U.S. Reform synagogues, who do similar work, yet their Wikipedia article is much more neutral. I've taken the liberty of hiding, yet not removing, some text that was, in my opinion simply unnecessary and added no value to the article. In time, this text should be deleted, assuming that there is consensus that it adds no value. An image of the synagogue building would improve the article quality. I've not verified any of the references, as there is simply way too many. As always, feedback is welcome. Cheers. Rangasyd (talk) 05:46, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]