Talk:Teresa Demjanovich

Untitled
In my opinion there is an underlying currect of POV prevalent in this article, such as frequent references to an assumed "God" and to the reader. Thoughts? K-UNIT 03:41, 31 March 2006 (UTC)

Excessive hagiography
This article is seriously flawed. It reads as OTT religious hagiography. Any time of hagiography (whether in rock music, religion, on politics, sex or anything else) is a no-no on Wikipedia. Hagiography involves an almost propagandistic tone of devotion that is not NPOV. This article needs severe rewriting to remove the devotional tone. Overall there is the bones of a good article here. It is just swamped with hagiographic tones. FearÉIREANN \(caint)|undefined 13:46, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Soon to be beatified
http://www.news.va/en/news/pope-approves-miracle-attributed-to-american-nun Irish Melkite (talk) 09:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC) http://www.northjersey.com/news/nun-from-n-j-a-step-closer-to-becoming-a-saint-1.1097711 not yet Djflem (talk) 18:06, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem
This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk💸Help out at CCI! 21:00, 13 November 2019 (UTC)