Talk:Terrorism in Sweden

Zimbabwe
What has this with 'Terrorism in Sweden' to do?

83.248.195.172 13:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Amalthea bombing
The bombing of the Amalthea ought to have a few sentences as well. Anyone with good sources at home? /Julle (talk) 09:10, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Swedish Nationalist
There should be some note about that. They have killed far more people during the last 10-15 years than any other group. And during 1930-50 there was some terror acts, like blowing up a papers office in northern Sweden. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:6B0:23:64:226:B9FF:FE7B:68E3 (talk) 00:34, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

And really? "Beside islamic terrorists" and no islamic terrorists was even mentioned yet! Two of them was not even proven to have done any terrorism, and one made all that in Iraq.

The only islamist terrorist was the one who blew up himself and noone else in Stockholm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:6B0:23:64:226:B9FF:FE7B:68E3 (talk) 00:43, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Why the "update" top warning signs?
User:Oranjelo100, please motivate the two templates added in January 2017. Otherwize we do not know when they can be removed.176.10.249.111 (talk) 08:24, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Well, it seems to be up to date now.Oranjelo100 (talk) 09:50, 8 April 2017 (UTC)

Who's editing this? What about these latest bombs?
http://time.com/4990765/sweden-bombs/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridingdog (talk • contribs) 02:04, 3 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Most likely not politically motivated, but connected to rivalry between criminal gangs. 06:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)


 * That is highly debatable. The goal of Narcoterrorism is twofold. To decrease the political will of fighting narco related crime, since doing so will yield chaos and political consequences. Second is marketing, since which organization commited the crime is known in the criminal underworld. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.227.37.219 (talk • contribs) 07:18, September 29, 2021 (UTC)

Fire bombings
The recent additions of fire bombings seems rather undue to me, and an example of recentism. People have thrown molotov cocktails at buildings for years whithout the attacks being added to the list. , and I don't think that we should list every instance of that. It's better to wait and see if there is a lasting impact of the events. Sjö (talk) 06:29, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

As member of Jewish community, I strongly disagree with the assessment, that these additions are insignificant. It seems at least one of this bombings have had antisemitic intentions. As further investigation happens and instigators are identified and their motives are clear, we can then decide the intention and merit of these acts, for now my vote is "keep". FreedomGonzo (talk) 10:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Are you saying that they should be included because the are crimes against the Jewish community? That is so against the policy WP:NPOV. There were some 50 arson attacks by unknown perps against asylum centres in 2016 alone, and a number of other attacks in the same year, e.g. . The make headlines for a while and then are forgotten, which is more or less the definition of what's not to be included as recentism and undue.
 * You also propose WP:SPECULATION about what will happen in the future. Please read WP:RECENT and WP:UNDUE and then make a policy-based argument for why these specific incidents should be included. Sjö (talk) 06:25, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Do you have any comments? If not, I will remove the incidents per my posts above. Sjö (talk) 15:40, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I agree with your assessments, there is nothing I can add from my end, so far these incidents have not been investigated thoroughly and motives are unknown, however if motives will be known and happen to be terrorism related, we will of course reinstate the mentions of the incidents. FreedomGonzo (talk) 17:18, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

1971 embassy shooting
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Yugoslav_Embassy_shooting 109.247.107.231 (talk) 12:13, 9 May 2023 (UTC)