Talk:The Boleyn Inheritance

I got rid of the trivia section, I saw that these are discouraged. Readd if you need it. Lawrence Cohen 00:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Plot Summary
Phew. I read this book and noticed it was one of the few novels without a detailed plot summary (or any plot summary at all), so I added a plot summary and formatted the article. I hope I did okay; I'm not too good on wikipedia but I think this was pretty well done. My summary might be a little lacking; please add as much as you can! Elesi (talk) 21:52, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Historical Inaccuracies
It states here that Jane Boleyn was not lady-in-waiting to Queen Jane Seymour; however, many sources (including Julia Fox's "Jane Boleyn: The True Story of the Infamous Lady Rochford" state that she was indeed a lady-in-waiting to Queen Jane. Where did this information come from?  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bastet13 (talk • contribs) 09:49, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

The note about Henry's daughters is inaccurate, as it describes Elizabeth as having regained her place as a princess during Henry's marriage to Katherine Parr. This is incorrect. Although Elizabeth, like Mary, was restored to the line of succession during her father's marriage to Katherine Parr, they were not restored as princesses or legitimised.86.47.42.32 (talk) 10:47, 30 December 2009 (UTC)

theoretical son of George and Jane
The current article states that "if they had had a son, he would have inherited the titles of Earl of Ormonde and Earl of Wiltshire." I don't think this is true. My understanding is that because Rochford was attainted, none of his descendants could inherit Thomas Boleyn's titles unless some special measure were passed to allow them to do so. john k (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2013 (UTC)