Talk:The Break-Up (30 Rock)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleThe Break-Up (30 Rock) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starThe Break-Up (30 Rock) is part of the 30 Rock (season 1) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 19, 2010Good article nomineeListed
May 8, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Break-Up (30 Rock)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Xtzou (Talk) 16:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am reviewing the article and will add my comments below. I did some minor copy editing of the article that I hope meets with your approval. Feel free to change and mistakes I made. Xtzou (Talk) 16:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    I have gone over the prose and changed a few things, hopefully ok.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR:
    There are two references to another wikipedia article, refs 11 and 12. That is a no-no. Wikipedia doesn't reference itself.
    Ref 23 (http://www.accessmylibrary.com/article-1G1-157033125/nielsen-primetime-ratings-report.html) doesn't seem to referenced the show.
    Um, it's not so supposed to be Wikipedia itself, it's a {{cite episode}} ref that is being used. The accesslibrary one, you have to have a log in for this one. If you do have one, then see where NBC is and check on Thursday and you'll find The Office, Scrubs, 30 Rock, and ER, and next to it are the ratings/share. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    In the Production section there is an over focus on other episodes that various actors played in. This is a diversion that might go in a article on the actor perhaps, but it is not relevant to this episode, I don't think.
    Removed them from Dratch's bit. Seems pretty notable to have it for Winters. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:42, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    NPOV
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
    Stable
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass
  • I have put the review on hold for seven days.

Xtzou (Talk) 16:55, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So there is no link to ref 11? Xtzou (Talk) 00:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You gotta understand that there wasn't much info. available during the show's first season. But, replaced. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 00:15, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Xtzou (Talk) 23:42, 16 April 2010 (UTC) Final GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance: }
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused: }
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:

Congratulations. Xtzou (Talk) 14:11, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on The Break-Up (30 Rock). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:The_Break-Up_(30_Rock)&oldid=1207828915"