Talk:The Cancer Genome Atlas

Untitled
Not clear that one person can really be "blamed" for inefficiencies of a large project and perhaps this article should stick to the facts. The numbers also presented and descriptions of infiltrating lymphocytes are simply not true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.231.8.139 (talk) 13:59, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I think this has been solved. I at least do not recall seeing anything like this while reading the article. JakobSteenberg (talk) 03:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

"whole exon sequencing on 80% of the cases and whole genome sequencing on 80% of the cases"
I suppose this was meant to be " whole exon sequencing on 80% of the cases and whole genome sequencing on 20% of the cases" but I don't want to edit it in case I misunderstood? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 163.1.97.76 (talk) 13:16, 21 July 2015 (UTC)