Talk:The Churchill Factor

Balance
The reviews we include say it is a naff history book written in a self-serving way to promote Johnson. This might be the consensus view of academia and journalists, though if it's not, then we're lacking balance. Solipsism 101 (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
 * The Times is more complimentary. Solipsism 101 (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)