Talk:The City in the Sea

Analysis
Okay, the analysis section is completely original research so sources are needed. Some of it was added by me so it's partly my fault. But, I'd like to recommend that no additions be made until sources are added for what is already there. For example, the last lines are analyzed twice in very different ways (as an aside, the second analysis is from someone who I think is a sockpuppet of a formal vandal trying to reform). Anyway, let's just go through whatever sources we may have and add it all in there so there's some semblance of credibility to this article. --Midnightdreary 15:51, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if I agree with all of the analysis, I'll see what I can do. -RiverHockey 13:58, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Really, all we need is sourced analysis from published scholars. I'm sure there's stuff out there. If I remember, I might do some digging later today or tonight. --Midnightdreary 15:53, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I got started a little bit. I left the original research up there for now, until we fill in. So far what I've added is pretty basic. If you've got better sources, jump right in! --Midnightdreary 00:16, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

--DavidJohns (talk) 17:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)]]One part of the analysis is just plain wrong. The west is a traditional location for the land of the dead. http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/amentet.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T%C3%ADr_na_n%C3%93g