Talk:The Dungeon Master

Content
As it currently stands, this article doesn't actually discuss what is in this book. The book was written to correct certain misconceptions that then existed about D&D, but this article mentions only the misconceptions - not the corrections, or even the fact that Dear knew they were misconceptions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.71.127.54 (talk) 08:04, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Care to fix it? :) 108.69.80.49 (talk) 08:52, 2 December 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't own the book, so I am poorly positioned to do so. I am just going by what I've heard of it elsewhere (originally from Stackpole though I was reminded of it by another Wikipedia article). 65.71.127.54 (talk) 04:44, 3 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, that's unfortunate. I don't have it either, unfortunately. Checked GoogleBooks? 108.69.80.49 (talk) 04:46, 3 December 2010 (UTC)

Fiction or Non-fiction?
It should be more clear whether the book is fictional, and how the book is structured. --Wjmelements (talk) 02:01, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Whether or not the events in the book are fully factual, it was written as non-fiction, which is how it should be presented. 2601:249:8A00:CB6:4AF1:7FFF:FEE5:C031 (talk) 02:55, 25 September 2019 (UTC)