Talk:The European Conservative

[Untitled]
Hi, the article is relevant and has references. I consider the demand for deletion as possibly politically motivated?

Contested deletion
This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Pepe1979 (talk) 17:13, 20 May 2022 (UTC) I don‘t see there any promotional tone or style. It‘s simply a collection of facts about the Review.

Could it be that the demand for deletion is politically motivated?

Usernames associated with edits
This page should be reviewed on a factual basis as it reads highly promotional, and the usernames associated with the edits lead me to believe that something is going on. 'Pepe' and 'European Conservative' (the last who may themselves be running this). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marleeashton (talk • contribs) 08:13, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Biased sourcing
Hey there, I added the "unreliable sources" template to the "Controversy" section for two reasons: (1) all of the sources in the section have a conservative slant, (2) all of the sources are included at the end, making it difficult to tell which statement is attributed to which source.

Here are the sources cited at the time of my adding the template:


 * Sa, Von Marco Gallina; September 2022, 3 (2022-09-03). "Die Cancel Culture reibt sich an Scrutons Erben". Tichys Einblick (in German). Retrieved 2022-10-21.
 * 1) "UK Bookstore Chain Cancels Catholic-Friendly Journal for Wrongthink". NCR. Retrieved 2022-10-21.
 * 2) Toro, Marisa de (2022-09-10). "No sufrirás pensamientos ni deseos conservadores". La Gaceta de la Iberosfera (in Spanish). Retrieved 2022-10-21.
 * 3) Hayward, Steven (2022-09-10). "Loose Ends (182)". Power Line. Retrieved 2022-10-21
 * 4) "Wie ein konservatives Magazin aus dem Handel verbannt wird" (in German). 2022-09-13. Retrieved 2022-10-21.

Wracking (talk) 07:27, 21 January 2023 (UTC)