Talk:The Internationale/Archives/2016

Proposed merge with The Internationale in Chinese
This is the same song and the main article has Russian, French etc lyrics. Per WP:NSONGS Richhoncho (talk) 12:09, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Support. Go on and merge them.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  17:38, 4 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Oppose the Chinese article is more than lyrics and is very large. And by the way, all lyrics must be moved into Wikisource. - üser:Altenmann >t 05:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * . Actually, neither are large if you remove the lyrics. Furthermore anybody interested in the song would be interested in the development of the song including the Chinese version. Any specific reason this particular song is exempt from WP:NSONGS? --Richhoncho (talk) 08:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * about size without lyrics you have a good point. As for NSONG, please don't confuse pop crap and historically notable items. Second, why do you think my suggestion violates NSONG? I clearly wrote the article is large. And has many footnotes. Ie fits the clause "a standalone article is only appropriate when there is enough material to warrant a reasonably detailed article". Of course, it lyrics is removed, merging would be OK. - üser:Altenmann >t 08:26, 6 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Support. Does anyone object at this point? Work permit (talk)
 * Support per nom Talk to SageGreenRider 01:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Support. Go on and merge, it's the only logical thing to do. Sideshow Bob 13:02, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
 * ✅. I went on and performed the merge.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  07:54, 26 July 2016 (UTC)