This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
This article was nominated for deletion on 16 September 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This page has been edited and now only includes encyclopedic information. This is a satirical newspaper, however the thoughts put forth in this article do not break Wikipedia's code on notability and legitimacy. References and outside sources have been attached.
It has been a week, and Wikipedia standards tells me that after a week, the article may stand given it fixes its page. We did in fact fix the page, so we feel that we are now free to remain on wikipedia.
No, that's not how it works. Where did you read that? Ironholds (talk) 13:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My mistake. It said that if the page hadn't been taken down in seven days, the warning would expire. I guess I misread it; nevertheless, we are continuing to edit our page in hopes to merit a stay on Wikipedia.
Here: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Michigan_Every_Three_Weekly is where you weigh in with comments during the deletion discussion. Try to fix up those cites if you can, that would help. Check out citation formats from other articles, like Off-Off_Campus for example. This article's deletion discussion was relisted on 9/23 to generate more discussion, so it should run til about 9/30 (but that's not guaranteed). And try to remain neutral and honest, since you have a conflict if you work for the publication. --Milowent (talk) 06:27, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
