Talk:The Other Conquest

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Other Conquest. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080704145443/http://www.mysanantonio.com/entertainment/columnists/lratliff/stories/MYSA050407.WK.conquest.be84c4.html to http://www.mysanantonio.com/entertainment/columnists/lratliff/stories/MYSA050407.WK.conquest.be84c4.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 15:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Too long and almost zero sources
The film here has a lot of the same problems as its director's article, and both appear to have been written by the director himself. Both also have self-promotional "peacock" language.

Since almost all of the information here has no sources or citations, and appears to have been sourced by the director itself (therefore self-promotional), I will go ahead and remove all the information without citation. Almost all of the information here appears unfit for Wikipedia's policies of verifiability WP:V, no original research WP:OR, and neutral point of view WP:NPOV. Bagabondo (talk) 03:14, 2 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Many of the issues with this article are the same as the one for its director (see: Talk:Salvador_Carrasco), so I will be brief: almost all of the information returned here is sourceless, and the information that does have sources go to dead links (including all the reviews from the "top critics"). I will remove all of that info right away.
 * Also, this new editor @Alcirengifo115 is evidently associated with the director of this film (again, see: Talk:Salvador_Carrasco), so his contributions that he has spammed with the summary "I am a Rotten Tomatoes-approved film critic conducting research on Mr. Carrasco's film and this is accurate, verified information that should be included in his profile page." will also be deleted (note how the editor forgot to remove the 'profile page' part for his contributions for this article).
 * I will say again: Wikipedia is not meant to be a promotional profile that anyone and their friends can fluff up for their own self-promotion, and this includes a person's work. Bagabondo (talk) 04:47, 3 November 2022 (UTC)