Talk:The Story of Tracy Beaker

Removal of vandalism
I've reverted to a a version from June 20th @ 13:36 as everything since then seemed to be vandalism. Basiclife (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

Merger of Tracey Beaker (TV series) with the Tracey Beaker article
I think this is the place to discuss this (sorry if it's not). I support the merge. Almost since this article was created it has been about the books an TV series. I don't see a need for two separate articles. There is not so much information that it needs splitting up. The subjects are not so different that much of the article wouldn;t be repeated in two places should there be separate articles. Therefore, I'd suggest merging. Evil Eye 13:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I completely disagree. The TV series features totally different characters to the book and some of the events are different. There must be a separate article for the book and TV show. I think the information not appropriate to the book should be moved to the TV article. Jamesb1 22:18, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Tracybeaker.jpg
Image:Tracybeaker.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 21:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC) (years ago) -P64

List of characters from the TV series.. on the page for the book?
Why is there a list of characters from the TV series on this page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.22.126 (talk) 19:31, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Removing TV Series Main Article
I've removed the dead link to the Tv Series Main Article as it has been merged into this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.172.225.55 (talk) 13:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

2002 Blue Peter
Someone has previously tagged this citation needed.

Let me here informally tag it clarification needed.

Both in this article and in Wilson's biography there must(should) be some explanation of this 2002 award for a 1991 book. Is this award annual? Does it look ten years back, as Phoenix Award looks twenty years back?

(and 1991 Carnegie runner up) It was the only Highly Commended runner up for the 1991 Carnegie Medal, a distinction that was approximately annual at the time. I have revised Wilson's biography with a reference. --P64 (talk) 19:02, 13 July 2012 (UTC)