Talk:The Superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I'd like to propose a npov tag for this page - the section on 'Rebuttal' reads like an argument completely in Buffet’s favor: Tmcw (talk) 20:01, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Buffett, despite his untarnished reputation in mainstream business press, remains rarely cited within traditional academia. A 2004 search of 23,000 papers on economics revealed only 20 references to any publication by Buffett. A significant share of references simply rebut Buffett's statements or reduce his own success to pure luck and probability theory.