Talk:The Truth About Uri Geller

Fair use rationale for Image:Magicofgeller.jpg
Image:Magicofgeller.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Thetruthuri.jpg
Image:Thetruthuri.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:36, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Broken Link
The link to http://www.prometheusbooks.com/site/catalog/book_727.html is broken. I suggest someone fixes this, because i don't know my way around editing. Thank you 81.207.100.251 (talk) 19:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

Comment
The publication date is incorrect. I gave my grandmother a copy of this book, circa 1975. She died in 1977, so the 1982 publication is clearly incorrect. Geo Swan (talk) 16:04, 9 October 2009 (UTC)

Irrelevant phrase?
This sentence...


 * In April 1992 Geller sued the Prometheus Books in Miami, Florida for $4 million alleging libel made in two other books. This was thrown out in 1994 and the judge ordered Geller to pay $20,272.89 in legal fees.

...doesn't seem relevant to me. What does this sentence have to do with The Truth About Uri Geller? Thanks. GoogolplexForce (talk) 01:33, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Promethteus Books published the book in question, how about that for relevance? Also: First Geller sued Randi, then Prometheus and finally Randi AND Prometheus. Even though the latter two lawsuits are not explicitly about TTAUG, they can be seen as having a connection because of the parties involved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.107.39.92 (talk) 19:35, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Whole article needs revision
First point, the section about the cereal box suit should be deleted. It is both irrelevant and misleading. Irrelevant because it has NOTHING to do with the book. Misleading because it misrepresents the result. Only the suit against CSICOP was dismissed. The suit against Randi succeeded, with Randi making an undisclosed settlement. This is a pretty big discussion, and irrelevant to this particular page.

The part about suing Prometheus is totally back to front. It was Randi's book TTAUG that contained the offending phrases 'brought to court', etc. The statement about him being arrested was in the book Physics and Psychics from prometheus, citing Randi as a source. It was Paul Kurtz, not Randi who made a statement admitting he had misunderstood the words. Geller did not lose the case. He settled for a public apology, and a correction. Prometheus paid HIS legal fees.

Some facts on the case from Marcello Truzzi, one of the founding fathers of CSICOP. http://www.uri-geller.com/psir.htm

80.194.30.137 (talk) 22:02, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on The Truth About Uri Geller. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080208184911/http://www.randi.org/jr/2007-02/020209morebrowne.html#i6 to http://www.randi.org/jr/2007-02/020209morebrowne.html#i6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 10:42, 1 March 2016 (UTC)