Talk:The Union: The Business Behind Getting High

NPOV dispute
This is pretty clearly taken straight from the back of a DVD or press release. It's not written in encyclopedic style, and poses rhetorical questions in place of facts. The matter is further muddled by the choice of words that make it -- at the very least -- an advertorial for the director. Phrases such as "Follow filmmaker Adam Scorgie as he dives head first," "Adam demystifies the underground market," and "Join Adam Scorgie," are unnecessary and a pretty clear example of a promotion. There's more, but the whole thing needs cleanup. Ndmiami517 (talk) 21:24, 6 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion
Just like many documentaries on Wikipedia, why shouldn't it get its own page? Read: Burma VJ, The Corporation, Grizzly Man Geoffgs (talk) 23:12, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've declined the speedy deletion, but only because there are older versions that can be reverted to that are not so blatantly spammy. As it reads at this moment it is just awful, and obviously miles away from the neutral point of view expected of an encyclopedia. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:27, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I also went ahead and reverted to an older version. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:29, 6 April 2010 (UTC)