Talk:The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Freikorp (talk · contribs) 13:43, 4 December 2017 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * "The writing was infused with real-life aspects" - this is a bit vague in the lead, can you clarify at all?
 * "some of which were later patched" - this needs a wikilink or explanation; non-gamers might not understand the terminology
 * "(one steel and one silver)" - I'm not sure if this is worth mentioning, but up to you
 * I went into more detail about their function. Cognissonance (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "(who pay in crowns)" - the lead says you earn "gold". Is 'crowns' the type of gold? I'm not sure if this bracketed information is worth mentioning in any case
 * You're right, there's no need to go into all of the monetary units. Cognissonance (talk) 10:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * "Gies from Polygon" - have I missed something? Why are we only using his surname?
 * 'people of color' could be wikilinked to Person of color
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: As I completed the peer review I'm already fairly familiar with this article. Very close to passing once minor issues are addressed. Freikorp (talk) 01:41, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ Cognissonance (talk) 10:29, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Passing. Well done. :) Freikorp (talk) 11:18, 5 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the review. Thank you  (plot, setting) and  (gameplay, post-release) for helping me with the article in June. It's a good article now because of you. Cognissonance (talk) 12:36, 5 December 2017 (UTC)