Talk:Threat assessment

Spelling and commas
Just fix the article. It should be obvious to any of us where the errors are, but I'm in a hurry and need to leave so I can't do it on my own. 2600:1700:B250:DAF0:1D99:D236:5AC4:9F49 (talk) 03:38, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Rather than write about what threat assessment "seeks" to do, why not talk about its effectiveness or the positives and negatives.

Why did the information about Pinkerton National Security and their proteges suddenly disappear from this article? Why did the information on the morals of threat assessment disappear (proportionality theories about morals vs. established truths about morals)? Heck, everyone is looking to make a few dollars these days.