Talk:Timashevsk

Requested move 11 January 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved. Rough consensus that Timashevsk is the WP:COMMONNAME by a sufficiently large margin to override the guidance in WP:RUS. (non-admin closure) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 17:08, 8 February 2023 (UTC)

Timashyovsk → Timashevsk – WP:COMMONNAME per Google Books Ngram. —Michael Z. 14:50, 11 January 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 02:55, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Google Advanced Book Search results, per WP:SET:
 * "Timashevsk" -Wikipedia Page 27 of about 23,500 results (263 actually shown)
 * "Timashëvsk" -Wikipedia 5 results
 * "Timashyovsk" -Wikipedia 4 results
 * "Timashiovsk" -Wikipedia 0


 * Google Scholar results:
 * "Timashevsk" -Wikipedia Page 23 of 235 results
 * "Timashëvsk" -Wikipedia 0
 * "Timashyovsk" -Wikipedia 7 results
 * "Timashiovsk" -Wikipedia 0
 * —Michael Z. 21:19, 19 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Support per link submitted within the nomination. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 19:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oppose, the number of hits is insufficient to determine what COMMONNAME is, and we need top use WP:RUS. The two above user are on a crusade in an editing area they have very little understanding about.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: WikiProject Russia has been notified of this discussion. – robertsky (talk) 02:56, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose any renaming of obscure Russian-language terms contrary to WP:RUS based on alleged English COMMONNAME. I might support changing the default transliteration of $⟨ё⟩$ to e rather than yo (despite the latter being more phonetically correct), but going piecewise like this is futile (and borders on disruption). No such user (talk) 08:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
 * On retrospect, I'm going to support this one. Transliteration $⟨ё⟩$ to $⟨e⟩$ is near-universal, and disparity in search results is overwhelming. Besides, transliteration "Timashyovsk" is just as misleading – it's pronounced "Timashovsk" (which yields a few results). If moved, we should include Timashyovsky District → Timashevsky District as well. No such user (talk) 08:59, 1 February 2023 (UTC)