Talk:Timeline of the city of Rome

Fragment of wall dating between the 9th c and the beginning of the 8th found
See "evidence of infrastructure building had been found, dating from more than 100 years earlier. The daily Il Messagero quoted Patrizia Fortini, the archaeologist responsible for the Forum, as saying that a wall constructed well before the city's traditional founding date had been unearthed.

The wall, made from blocks of volcanic tuff, appeared to have been built to channel water from an aquifer under the Capitoline hill that flows into the river Spino, a tributary of the Tiber. Around the wall, archaeologists found pieces of ceramic pottery and remains of food.

"The examination of the ceramic material was crucial, allowing us today to fix the wall chronologically between the 9th century and the beginning of the 8th century," said Fortini." Dougweller (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Propose move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved.   A rbitrarily 0   ( talk ) 03:48, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Timeline of the history of Rome → Timeline of Rome – for consistency with other article titles in Category:Italian city history timelines, and to distinguish from Timeline of ancient Rome. Ivanvector (talk) 22:01, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Strong support – It makes complete sense, and there's no real reason to have its name be inconsistent with the other such articles. (I think you messed up the title of the article in your proposal, though; it's currently at "Timeline of the history of Rome", not "Timeline of Rome history".) --V2Blast (talk) 07:51, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: not Ivan's fault; the article was renamed after the proposal was created. I've fixed the header. Favonian (talk) 17:31, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. I didn't actually think to check if that was the case. Cheers. --V2Blast (talk) 23:14, 22 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.