Talk:Tin Pan Alley/Archives/2015

Use of term outside New York and London
There is a debate over whether the term has ever been used outside New York and London. Text below is copied across from User talk:Ritchie333: Ghmyrtle (talk) 16:48, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

My only intention was to correct some factual errors on the pages. The phrase ″is also used to describe any area within a major city with a high concentration of music publishers  or musical instrument stores″ is simply not based in fact as the term 'Tin Pan Alley’ is not used as such. It is only used, as far as i am aware, in reference to two specific places, namely West 28th Street between Fifth and Sixth Avenue in Manhattan, New York, and Denmark Street in London. Other places referred to as "Tin Pan Alley" in other cities generally refer to specific venues, rather than "areas". So my change from

This

" By extension, the term "Tin Pan Alley" is also used to describe any area within a major city with a high concentration of music publishers or musical instrument stores – an example being Denmark Street[2][3] in London's West End. In the 1920s the street became known as "Britain's Tin Pan Alley" because of the large number of music shops, a title it still holds.".

To This

"By extension, the term "Tin Pan Alley" has also been adopted for Denmark Street[2][3] in London's West End. In the 1920s the area became known as "Britain's Tin Pan Alley" because of the large number of music shops, a title it still holds".

Only reflects an interest in the factual as opposed to anything subjective.

Kind Regards, Robbie Prudence 14:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbie Prudence (talk • contribs)


 * Hi, thanks for getting in touch. Well the good news about Tin Pan Alley is that I tend to only revert things once, so provided you make a good case for your changes (which you've done here), then just undo my edit. I can't promise another editor will leave it, but that's the consensus model we use.


 * The ed

its to Denmark Street are a little more problematic, as you've asserted you're affiliated with Consolidated Developments, who are rebuilding the area between the street and TCR tube. That creates a problem with you editing, as you have a potential conflict of interest. As I think I said on your talk, the squatters who took over the 12 Bar Club's former premises also edit Wikipedia, and their opinion of what should happen to the street probably doesn't align with yours! As long as you say up-front your prejudices on your user page though, you should be okay. Only thing to watch is that Denmark Street is a good article, so the bar for what edits will be accepted is higher, as every fact in the article is (or should be!) verifiable by a good quality source. I do like popping into Denmark Street and looking at gear, and the one time I played at the 12 Bar when it was at number 26 was magical, but we've got to remember to keep a neutral point of view on articles here. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * And, as predicted... because neither the edit summary nor the article talk page alerted me to this discussion, I've reverted at Tin Pan Alley, for what appeared to be an unsourced and ungrammatical edit.  But, I take the point...  I'll revert myself and tweak the wording, for clarity.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

If there is no source that "Tin Pan Alley" is used as a generic name, then that "fact" should not be in the lede. And the fcat that another place has been dubbed "Britain's Tin Pan Alley" is interesting, but not a significant-enough fact to be in the lede of this article. Therefore, I have removed the unsourced generic statement, removed the factoid about Denmark Street, and added Denmark Street to the "see also" list, which is the most appropriate place for it to be mentioned in this article. BMK (talk) 17:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Please don't shout even though you clearly have a very strong view about this. I'm not convinced you are right.  The article is about Tin Pan Alley.  More than one place is called Tin Pan Alley, and so it's absolutely right that those places should be mentioned in the article and, by extension, in the lede.   If the article were called West 28th Street, there would be no need to refer to Denmark Street in the article.  But, it isn't - it's about Tin Pan Alley.  I suppose there is a case for turning this page into a disambiguation page - but that would be silly, when the existence of the London TPA can simply be noted in this article.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * There is absolutely no case to turn this into a dab page, that's utterly ridiculous, and the article isn;t about West 28th Street, it's about a couple of blocks of West 28th Street. Please get your facts straight, and stop arguing absurdities. BMK (talk) 17:31, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not arguing absurdities, I'm trying to encourage you to engage in a civil debate, in preference to reverting on sight and expressing yourself in capitals, and bold underlined italics - never a good approach. This article is called Tin Pan Alley.  More than one place is called Tin Pan Alley.  Do you agree?  Ghmyrtle (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd agree, it's not absurd at all. I have no problem with seeing a mention of Denmark Street in the lede. But I'd start with agreeing what should go in the main body about Denmark Street, as the lede is meant to summarise the whole article. I think it should be more than just an appearance as an item in "See also." Martinevans123 (talk) 18:22, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The "abusrdity" I referred to was the idea of converting this article into a dab page.Where would you intend to put Denmark Street in the body, exactly? BMK (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Why are Ghmyrtle's facts "not straight" exactly? Martinevans123 (talk) 18:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Probably because I referred to West 28th Street rather than "a couple of blocks of West 28th Street". No big deal.  And I never suggested that this should become a dab page (I said "that would be silly") - but I was suggesting that that was where 's logic seemed to be leading.  Anyway.... shall we return to the wording that rested peacefully in this article until this kerfuffle, and see if the other editor,, still wants to pursue a change?   Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:15, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * No. The general claim that is used as a generic does not (as far as I can tell) appear in the body of the article, and therefore should not be in the lede.  If it was in the lede without being in the body, it would have to be sourced.  If that is done, then we can talk about Denmark Street, but I am strenuously opposed to Denmark Street being in the lede, as a miscellaneous fact of little to no importance to the subject matter. BMK (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Perhaps User:Robbie Prudence could propose an addition to the main body as well. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * As a representtaive of the devleopment company that owns property in Denmark Street, he shouldn't get withing 100ft of writing anything about that subject.
 * Let's see what User:Ritchie333 has to say. Martinevans123 (talk) 19:46, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * We could, for example, have a new section, "Extension to other areas", with the text something like: "By extension, the term "Tin Pan Alley" is also used to describe any area within a major city with a high concentration of music publishers or musical instrument stores – an example being Denmark Street in London's West End. In the 1920s the street became known as "Britain's Tin Pan Alley" because of the large number of music shops, a title it still holds. "  If further sources suggest that London is, in fact, the only other city where the term is used, we could modify the text accordingly.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I see that the mention of New York in this report by The Guardian, is quite brief: "Nicknamed Tin Pan Alley (because streets sound cooler when you name them after bits of New York)...". Martinevans123 (talk) 19:55, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * The material used to be in a section called "Other uses". If you find a source for another use beside Denmark Street, fine, but until then, something on the order of "The term 'Tin Pan Alley' is also used to describe Denmark Street in London's West End. In the 1920s the street became known as 'Britain's Tin Pan Alley' because of its large number of music shops." could be added, possibly to the popcult section. BMK (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd go along with including that text for the time being, but I think it needs to be in its own section as I suggested - "Other areas" - rather than being subsumed into a "Popular culture" section dealing with quite different uses of the term. (By the way, isn't this whole article about popular culture?  See also Mick Jagger - bizarre.)  Ghmyrtle (talk) 21:13, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Whatever are people thinking?! He's a SERIOUS PERFORMER!! Martinevans123 (talk) 21:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I think one-sentence sections are not a good idea. How about appending it to the "Name" section, as in "The names is also used to describe Denmark Street..." etc? BMK (talk) 22:51, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * That would certainly be an improvement. I'll do that.  Ghmyrtle (talk) 09:24, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

I think we're all done here, but there is a blue plaque on Denmark Street describing it as "Tin Pan Alley". However, even think I think most people would agree the Tin Pan Alley is in New York. I've never said "I'm going to Tin Pan Alley to look at some guitars", but I have said "I'm going to Denmark Street to look at some guitars" many, many times. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  09:24, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * I note the end date of 1992 on the plaque - did the music stores close down? Incidentally, I don't believe those blocks of West 28th Street were ever noted for having musical instrument stores, which seems to be the case for Denmark Street -- it was music publishers Tin Pan Alley was known for.  I can't vouch for where the musical instrument stores were at the time, since these clusters had a tendency to move uptown as the city expanded, but since at least 1970 the strip of musical instrument stores in Manhattan was on West 48th Street between Sixth and Seventh Avenues.  I think most of them are gone now, even Sam Ash has moved to 34th Street - although a couple may be left. BMK (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Or was 1992 when New York finally won the copyright claim? Martinevans123 (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * 1992 was the year the last music publisher, Peer Music, moved out of the street. It wasn't in the article for some reason, so I've added it (with a source). I realise that I am not a reliable source, but last time I was in Denmark Street about a month ago, there were still plenty of instrument shops there. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  13:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, that clarifies things considerably. BMK (talk) 20:58, 29 June 2015 (UTC)