Talk:Titanic: The Legend Goes On

mr walker
is it worth sticking the NC review of this in the external links? i am unsure on such matters
 * I think that this issue is a point of conflict. One one hand, Walker is a comedian, so his opinion is not that of a professional critic. On the other hand, I believe he is partially responsible for bringing the film to a wider public (Sometime after the NC episode debuted, it started entering IMDb's bottom 250 list). So its a mixed bag. Freshh! (talk) 14:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Listed in "Worst Films"?
Would it be safe to say that this should be included in the list of the worst films ever made? --67.255.12.119 (talk) 15:13, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
 * There is a lack of legit reviews (i.e. from professional critics and not bloggers or comedians), so we'll wait and see. Freshh! (talk) 14:24, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Language/differences between versions
Per WP:FILM guidelines and the template itself, the only language listed under the "Language" parameter is the original language in the film (i.e., not dubs). Differences between various versions are discouraged by WP:FILMPLOT. Additionally, unless such differences are the subject of substantial discussion in independent reliable sources, the differences are trivial. If no such sources exist, identifying such differences is original research. - Sum mer PhD  (talk) 03:18, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Possibly a rip-off from another film?
When I saw this through Danny Gonzalez, I was immediately pointing out that the plot looks eerily similar to the 1997 film "Titanic" but flipped the classes of the man and the woman (in '97 Titanic, we see that the man is 3rd class and the woman is 1st class, while this film shows the man is 1st class and the woman is 3rd class) and just added some unnecessary animals into the film, other than that its basically identical to '97 Titanic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arsenal Pro 1975 (talk • contribs) 11:41, 4 December 2021 (UTC)