Talk:Tivoli Theatre (Chattanooga, Tennessee)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Copyright problem removed[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.chattanoogasymphony.org/index.cfm?pageID=tivoliHistory#pageID_is_tivoliHistory. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:30, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination[edit]

Cgh753[edit]

Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia and am interested in editing this page as a part of my project. I'm currently finding research in books on America's theatre history. I think its important to know what theatre was like when the Tivoli theatre was built. Do you have any feedback for me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cgh753 (talkcontribs) 03:19, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for cgh753's Revisions[edit]

The section contains a few grammatical errors ("it's condition" should be "its condition"; "was considered as significant landmark" should be "was considered a significant landmark") that should be fixed. Also, the section needs sources and citations. Simonlillard (talk) 17:02, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestions for cgh753's Revisions[edit]

Your section needs to have resources and citations. It also needs to have a lot more information. Cmsallas (talk) 22:17, 16 October 2014 (UTC)cmsallas[reply]