Talk:Tliltocatl albopilosus

Images
I made a gallery and uploaded a picture of a juvenile as well. Didn't remove anything from the article.Privateiron (talk) 12:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Pets
Oh goodie, another irrelevent pet section that is more of a care sheet than anything else. Wiki doesn't need these sections. Again, I will delete in the next few days if no one can come up with a good reason to keep it. At most there should be something saying they are popularly kept as pets or something of that ilk. A care sheet it should not be. Man Over-bored (talk) 14:41, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

Copy/paste
A somewhat over-zealous editor made me take a second look at this page for references, and its pretty clear that the conservation section is just a copy paste of this website: http://www.arkive.org/curlyhair-tarantula/brachypelma-albopilosum/

I know with wikipedia its a chicken/egg situation but the website does claim to have been authenticated in 2008, whereas the conservation section doesn't appear to have been here before 2011. It also directly cites CITES (kek), which is pretty useless in of itself. Needs updated. Man Over-bored (talk) 13:50, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Brachypelma albopilosum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080514130441/http://www.eightlegs.org/curly/curly.html to http://www.eightlegs.org/curly/curly.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 01:13, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Improper move
moved this page from Brachypelma to Tlitocatl based on a single primary source. This is contrary to WP:PSTS. We report what primary sources say, but we wait until a reliable secondary source, in this case the World Spider Catalog, accepts a genus change. Otherwise there is no guarantee that other zoologists will accept the move. Peter coxhead (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2019 (UTC)